Vetted member communities, indexed by who they actually serve.
Not a list of every group that exists. A list of the ones worth knowing about, described in their own terms: audience, threshold, format, and what they’re best for.
Long Angle
A private community for first-generation HNW individuals, typically post-liquidity operators and investors, who want substantive peer dialogue on portfolio construction, tax strategy, and the less-discussed parts of wealth.
- Audience
- High-net-worth individuals
- Threshold
- Avg net worth ~$15M
- Format
- Peer community with virtual and in-person sessions
- Best for
- Investing, Tax, Philanthropy, Relationships
Hampton
A community of founders and CEOs organized into small, vetted peer groups. Operators discuss the specific problems of running a business at scale, hiring, capital, personal finance, and the weight of the job, with people in the same seat.
- Audience
- Founders and CEOs
- Threshold
- $3M–$50M+ company scale
- Format
- Core peer groups plus curated events
- Best for
- Scaling operators, CEO peer dialogue, Founder mental health
TIGER 21
A long-running peer organization for UHNW wealth creators. Members meet monthly in small chapters and each year present their full portfolio for structured peer review. Skews toward seasoned principals focused on preserving and transferring capital.
- Audience
- Ultra-high-net-worth individuals
- Threshold
- $20M+ net worth
- Format
- Monthly peer groups with portfolio review
- Best for
- Portfolio defense, Multigenerational planning, Peer accountability
Enter the Index
A private network for entrepreneurs and active investors operating at the mid-to-high eight-figure level. Emphasis on direct introductions, deal discussion, and programming that favors depth over attendance.
- Audience
- Entrepreneurs and investors
- Threshold
- $10M+
- Format
- Private network with curated introductions and programming
- Best for
- Deal flow, Operator-to-investor transition, High-trust intros
QP List is editorial, not affiliated. Thresholds and formats reflect public positioning by each group and may change.
Compare groups side by side →